Our VoiceImmigration

Sen. Sessions to head key immigration subcommittee. He’s still no champion for workers.

Imagine2050 Staff • Jan 21, 2015

As Congressional Republicans struggle to explain their stance on immigration, the possible appointment of Sen. Jeff Sessions to lead a key subcommittee could spell trouble for any kind of meaningful reform this year.

According to Politico, Sessions is expected to be named chairman of the Senate Subcommittee on Immigration, Refugees and Border Security, which oversees immigration law. The Judiciary Committee is scheduled to formally assign its subcommittee positions on Thursday.

Sessions has been one of President Obama’s critics on immigration. In a statement following last night’s State of the Union address, the Alabama senator issued a statement that criticizes the president’s move to temporarily protect some immigrants from deportation and claims, once again, that immigrants are taking jobs from “everyday Americans.”

“On immigration, the president remains wedded to a lawless policy that serves only the interest of an international elite while reducing jobs and benefits for everyday Americans. All net employment gains since the recession in 2007 have gone to foreign workers, and yet the President has violated federal law in order to provide work permits to 5 million illegal immigrants—allowing them to take any of the few good jobs that exist. In effect, the President delivered an address tonight to a Congress whose authority he does not recognize and to a public whose votes he has nullified with an imperial edict. Congress must use every tool at its disposal to stop this unlawful edict, end the immigration lawlessness, and reverse our slide towards congressional irrelevance.”

Sessions often makes his case against immigration by claiming he is for American workers. But his record tells a different story.

This repost from Imagine 2050 explains how Sessions, along with his allies in the anti-immigrant movement, has “next-to-no interest in defending workers unless he can scapegoat immigrants in the process.”

Senator Jeff Sessions, no champion for American workers

September 4, 2014 | Imagine 2050 Staff

Since meaningful immigration reform has been killed by House Republicans, advocates are increasingly looking to President Obama to use his lawful authority to provide some form of administrative relief for undocumented immigrants. The organized anti-immigrant movement in this country, however, has also been looking to someone to help advance their nativist policy aims.

From the moment Congress began considering reform proposals after the 2012 elections, Sen. Sessions has positioned himself as leader against the lives of immigrants. In doing so, he has emerged as a champion of that movement’s social agenda.

Sessions regularly frames his opposition to immigrants as a means to defend workers.

This false-trope of “humble and honest populism” – as he described it in a memo to Republican colleagues last summer – is parroted (when not first authored) by influential Beltway anti-immigrant organizations, specifically the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) and NumbersUSA.

However, like those groups, Sessions is no such champion.

A quick glance at his voting record shows that he has next-to-no interest in defending workers unless he can scapegoat immigrants in the process.

As Ezra Klein wrote for The Washington Post’s Wonkblog last year:

  • In February 2012, Sessions opposed extending payroll tax cuts that would have saved working families about $1,000 per year.
  • Sessions also opposed the American Jobs Act that would have created tax breaks for working families, reduced the federal deficit and created incentives for employers to hire unemployed veterans.
  • In 2007, Sessions voted against the Employer Free Choice Act. Klein notes the legislation would have “made certain that the gains of the economy were shared more equitably between labor and capital.”
  • Sessions has also consistently opposed other tax cuts for middle class workers, raising the minimum wage and extending unemployment insurance and food assistance programs for working families who struggle every day.

With such a clear anti-worker voting record, how can Sen. Sessions credibly be considered a defender of workers? His record proves that while working families pay out and lose out, he’s happy paying lip-service to their struggles while blocking concrete measures that would improve their lives.

The aforementioned Beltway anti-immigrant groups that Sessions so closely aligns himself with can claim they are simply single-issue organizations in order to deflect criticism of their hypocrisy on immigration’s broadly positive effects on our economy all they want – as usual, they’re lying. As an elected official, however, Sen. Sessions has no excuse.

Underscoring that, Sessions has spent the last two years bringing himself ever closer to those groups, not to the workers he claims to care about. He has attended anti-immigrant rallies, sought legislative counsel from its representatives and regularly upheld the movement’s dubious research in press releases and media appearances.

Last week at Imagine 2050, we highlighted how the anti-immigrant movement’s purported support of workers is disingenuous and predicated on 5 particular distortions.

Sessions certainly utilizes these distortions to manufacture his image as a populist hero championing the rights of workers. However, until he and this movement propose some pragmatic policies that truly support workers – rather than demonizing immigrant communities – both will continue to reveal the bigotry that drives their efforts.

In other words, there’s nothing “humble and honest” about Sessions or his anti-immigrant allies.

As Ezra Klein wrote last year:

“After all, the Congressional Budget Office projects the [immigration reform] bill will generate at least $200 billion in net revenues through 2023, and about a trillion dollars through 2033. Sessions could author an amendment to put all that money into the Earned Income Tax Credit. Or he could use it to fund a lavish education and training program for poorer Americans, so they can upgrade their skills – and their economic prospects – at no cost.

But Sessions doesn’t want to do any of that. He just wants to kill immigration reform. It’s almost as if his opposition to the bill isn’t really about poor Americans at all.”

A year later, it’s clear – his opposition hasn’t been about helping the poor.

It never was.

Source Image: wikipedia.org via creativecommons.org

Imagine 2050 Newsletter

  • translate

    English • Afrikaans • العربية • Беларуская • Български • Català • Česky • Cymraeg • Dansk • Deutsch • Eesti • Ελληνικά • Español • فارسی • Français • Gaeilge • Galego • हिन्दी • Hrvatski • Bahasa Indonesia • Íslenska • Italiano • עברית • Latviešu • Lietuvių • 한국어 • Magyar • Македонски • മലയാളം • Malti • Nederlands • 日本語 • Norsk (Bokmål) • Polski • Português • Română • Русский • Slovenčina • Slovenščina • Shqip • Srpski • Suomi • Svenska • Kiswahili • ไทย • Tagalog • Türkçe • Українська • Tiếng Việt • ייִדיש. • 中文 / 漢語